<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: tv</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sensoryoutput.com/2007/01/10/%ef%a3%bftv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sensoryoutput.com/2007/01/10/%ef%a3%bftv/</link>
	<description>brainy wonders</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 00:28:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://sensoryoutput.com/2007/01/10/%ef%a3%bftv/comment-page-1/#comment-408</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 22:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sensoryoutput.com/archives/2007/01/10/%ef%a3%bftv/#comment-408</guid>
		<description>Ok, 500 GB would probably be overkill given the price point of Apple TV. (Currently, a 500 GB drive is more expensive retail than the Apple TV itself!) Still, you get my point: 40 GB just isn&#039;t up to snuff in a world of terabyte drives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, 500 GB would probably be overkill given the price point of Apple TV. (Currently, a 500 GB drive is more expensive retail than the Apple TV itself!) Still, you get my point: 40 GB just isn&#8217;t up to snuff in a world of terabyte drives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 13/16 queries in 0.009 seconds using disk

Served from: sensoryoutput.com @ 2012-05-17 22:50:08 -->
